Communication Profile · Sample
Session 04 · 18:42
Communication overview
82
Composite signal
+6 vs. last session
- Presence86
- Confidence79
- Delivery84
- Clarity88
- Trust81
- Impact76
Strengths
Steady pacing and a clear opening signal. Audience perceived calm authority through the first 60 seconds.
Growth areas
Closing softens. A drop in vocal energy in the final 20 seconds reduces memorability.
Behavioral pattern
Pattern: deferred authority
Audience impact
Likely read as competent and considered. Less likely to be remembered as the strongest voice in the room.
Pace
142 wpm
Pause
0.62s
Energy
Med-High
Filler
2.1%
Recommendations
- 01
Lead the close with your strongest sentence. Hold pace through the final beat.
- 02
Drop one filler bridge per 30 seconds, replace with a 0.5s pause.
- 03
Anchor eye contact at three points in the room, not one.
Growth roadmap
- This weekClosing strength · vocal energy through the final beat
- Next 30 daysReduce filler density · widen pause variation
- Quarter goalImpact 76 → 85
The science behind Social Stage.
Starting a conversation, setting a boundary and supporting a friend call for different skills. Social Stage brings research on interpersonal competence, reciprocal conversation and assertiveness into realistic practice and specific feedback.
Research you can trace. Practice you can use.
Interpersonal competence
Research distinguishes starting contact, sharing about yourself, assertion, emotional support and conflict management. You practice the skills relevant to the situation you chose.
Starting & ending conversations
Studies reveal mistaken expectations about stranger interactions and difficulty coordinating endings. Practice gives you room to begin an exchange and close it clearly.
Responsive exchange
Studies of follow-up questions and reciprocal sharing inform practice in responding to what was said and offering a contribution of your own.
Assertiveness & boundaries
The assertiveness literature informs rehearsal of requests, refusals and concerns. You practice communicating your position while respecting the other person's choice. Agreement is not the goal of every encounter.
Supportive listening
Research on informal helping conversations informs practice in acknowledging what someone shares and responding to expressed needs, rather than automatically offering solutions.
Critical Incident Technique
Flanagan's focus on specific, observable behavior informs Key Moments: exchanges selected to explain what worked, what needs attention and what you could try next.
From the exchange to the feedback.
Each finding starts with a specific moment in your conversation.
Your report connects what was said with the skill being practiced, explains what worked or needs attention, and offers a possible alternative. There can be more than one effective response.
Key Moments brings these observations into focus. Your Next Step turns them into something to practice. Your Impression places your expectations and your own post-session view alongside evidence from the exchange.
Explore the foundations.
Buhrmester et al. · 1988Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships+−
Defines distinct interpersonal tasks, helping focus practice on what a situation calls for.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 991–1008.
Read the source ↗ (opens in a new tab)Huang et al. · 2017It doesn't hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking+−
Informs feedback on relevant follow-up questions and responses that build on what was said.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 430–452.
Read the source ↗ (opens in a new tab)Sprecher et al. · 2013Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions+−
Informs practice in sharing something of your own while making room for the other person.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 860–866.
Read the source ↗ (opens in a new tab)Speed, Goldstein & Goldfried · 2018Assertiveness training: A forgotten evidence-based treatment+−
Informs rehearsal of requests, concerns and clear personal boundaries.
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 25(1), e12216.
Read the source ↗ (opens in a new tab)Bodie et al. · 2015The role of “active listening” in informal helping conversations+−
Informs practice in acknowledging difficult news and responding to expressed needs.
Western Journal of Communication, 79(2), 151–173.
Read the source ↗ (opens in a new tab)Epley & Schroeder · 2014Mistakenly seeking solitude+−
Shows why uncertain expectations about stranger interactions deserve attention when practicing an opening.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 1980–1999.
Read the source ↗ (opens in a new tab)Mastroianni et al. · 2021Do conversations end when people want them to?+−
Highlights the coordination involved in bringing a conversation to a close.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(10), e2011809118.
Read the source ↗ (opens in a new tab)Flanagan · 1954The critical incident technique+−
Informs the focus on specific observable exchanges in Key Moments.
Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
Read the source ↗ (opens in a new tab)Social Stage applies research to communication practice for adults. The cited studies did not test or validate its AI assessment, and the feedback is not a clinical assessment, treatment or guarantee of real-world outcomes.
Put the research into practice.
Explore Social Stage